This might seem like a small concession, but the truth is, without realistic text-to-speech, your productions suffer immensely. Not all text-to-speech platforms are equal and not all sound realistic. And they didn’t have to foot the bill for costly microphones, headphones, technology, post-production or retakes. They didn’t have to burden internal employees with recording scripts in addition to their regular work duties. With text-to-speech, companies didn’t have to slow down their production process by auditioning voice actors, booking recording studios, or scheduling retakes. However, as new technologies like realistic ai voice over emerged, many companies began favoring this AI-predictive technology over human voiceovers. They were human, so they were about as human- sounding as one could get. Thus, there was never any issue or debate about the voices sounding realistic. Up until this point in history, most voiceovers or narrations were recorded by humans.
Why does realistic text-to-speech matter? Companies, course creators, authors, and entertainers all use text-to-speech for learning and development content, training videos, audiobooks, marketing, and other productions. Text-to-speech converts written copy, or scripts, into spoken words. In this article, we address why realistic, human-sounding text-to-speech is essential and how to find the most realistic text-to-speech engine for your content. But none of it matters unless the text-to-speech sounds realistic. There are many benefits to text-to-speech, from time-savings, workflow efficiencies, and budget optimizations.
0 kommentar(er)
